Canada-U.S. tariffs: Market and sector implications

Ilan Kolet, Institutional Portfolio Manager and member of Fidelity’s Asset Allocation Group, examines how rising trade tensions could affect sectors, currencies, commodities and market positioning.

Play Video
Click to play video
Transcript

WEBVTT

 

00:04.204 --> 00:08.375

Hi everyone. I wanted to provide a quick update regarding the

 

00:08.375 --> 00:12.278

collapse of the trade talks between Canada and the United States.

 

00:12.278 --> 00:16.049

Let me walk you through what happened, why it matters and how it fits into the

 

00:16.049 --> 00:19.386

way we've been positioning portfolios all year.

 

00:19.386 --> 00:22.389

So what happened? For over a year, Canada and U.S.

 

00:22.389 --> 00:26.526

Have been negotiating a renewal of CUSMA, our free trade agreement.

 

00:26.526 --> 00:30.463

Back on July 1st, the U. S. Actually declined to extend the deal in its current

 

00:30.463 --> 00:33.867

form. Which kicked off a tougher round of talks.

 

00:33.867 --> 00:37.904

Things looked like they were making real progress in recent weeks, but

 

00:37.904 --> 00:39.205

Friday night, it all fell apart.

 

00:40.206 --> 00:44.344

The US proposed new terms at the last minute that Prime Minister Carney

 

00:44.344 --> 00:47.113

called unfair and uneconomic.

 

00:47.113 --> 00:50.850

Canada's negotiators came back to Ottawa, and just after midnight, the US

 

00:50.850 --> 00:55.355

followed through on a threat it had been holding over Canada, a 50%

 

00:55.355 --> 00:59.225

tariff on about $20 billion worth of Canadian goods.

 

00:59.225 --> 01:03.296

Hitting things like dairy, alcohol and building materials.

 

01:03.296 --> 01:04.998

Canada's response was quick.

 

01:04.998 --> 01:09.402

Canada will match those tariffs dollar for dollar starting September 8th,

 

01:09.402 --> 01:13.073

targeting sectors like steel, dairy and electronics.

 

01:13.073 --> 01:17.243

And news reports suggest that we shouldn't expect talks to resume anytime

 

01:17.243 --> 01:20.880

soon. So we should be prepared for this to run for a while.

 

01:22.549 --> 01:25.318

Why it matters. But here's the thing.

 

01:25.318 --> 01:29.456

This shouldn't come as a surprise to anyone who's been following our research.

 

01:29.456 --> 01:32.525

We have been telling this story for over a year now.

 

01:32.525 --> 01:36.529

Back in the summer of last year, we made the call that the drift away

 

01:36.529 --> 01:39.566

from the US was not a temporary blip.

 

01:39.566 --> 01:42.168

It was a durable, structural shift.

 

01:42.168 --> 01:46.206

And by the fall of last, we were already flagging concerns about

 

01:46.206 --> 01:50.710

the increased political influence of US institutions and

 

01:50.710 --> 01:54.848

building a more constructive case for Canada, even while the domestic economy

 

01:54.848 --> 01:57.417

still looked weak on paper.

 

01:57.417 --> 01:58.852

So, what does it mean for positioning?

 

01:59.886 --> 02:03.223

How does this fit into what we've been doing in the funds we manage for

 

02:03.223 --> 02:04.958

Canadian investors?

 

02:04.958 --> 02:08.428

A few ways. First, diversification away from the U.S.

 

02:08.428 --> 02:12.065

Dollar and U. S. Assets. Something we have been doing since the start of this

 

02:12.065 --> 02:14.400

year looks prescient today.

 

02:14.400 --> 02:17.737

We're not scrambling to react to this weekend's news.

 

02:17.737 --> 02:21.708

We've been building in resilience in the event of this kind of

 

02:21.708 --> 02:25.845

scenario. Second, this is a textbook example of

 

02:25.845 --> 02:27.947

the kind of geopolitical shock.

 

02:27.947 --> 02:31.384

We've been positioning for with commodities and gold.

 

02:31.384 --> 02:35.388

When trade relationships get disrupted, hard assets tend to hold their

 

02:35.388 --> 02:38.024

value better than promises on paper.

 

02:38.024 --> 02:42.028

And that's exactly the kind of hedge we've leaned into.

 

02:42.028 --> 02:46.332

And third, and this might sound counterintuitive, our view on Canada hasn't

 

02:46.332 --> 02:50.303

changed. The team has argued for months that Canada may be reaching

 

02:50.303 --> 02:52.071

an inflexion point.

 

02:52.071 --> 02:56.476

Cyclically well-positioned, benefiting from strong commodity demand, and

 

02:56.476 --> 03:00.880

increasingly attractive. To global capital precisely because

 

03:00.880 --> 03:04.450

it's diversifying away from the US dependence.

 

03:04.450 --> 03:08.655

A trade dispute is a real near-term headwind, no question, but it doesn't

 

03:08.655 --> 03:10.890

undercut the structural case.

 

03:10.890 --> 03:15.228

If anything, it reinforces why Canada is actively working to

 

03:15.228 --> 03:18.331

reduce that dependence in the first place.

 

03:18.331 --> 03:22.335

Bottom line, this is a genuine escalation and we're watching it closely, but

 

03:22.335 --> 03:26.372

its It's not a reason to panic and it's not a reason abandon the positioning

 

03:26.372 --> 03:28.074

we've had in place.

 

03:28.074 --> 03:32.111

If anything, the last few days are a reminder of why

 

03:32.111 --> 03:36.249

we have positioned these portfolios to be resilient to exactly

 

03:36.249 --> 03:38.017

this kind of shock.

 

03:38.017 --> 03:39.018

Thanks for watching.

Listen to the podcast version